Posts Tagged ‘science’

Edmondson Asks: What does it mean to be a STEM school?

August 20th, 2012

Lab coats? Check!
Beakers and Solutions? Check!
Hands-on learning? Check!
A Day of Thoughtful Inquiry? Check!

As all teachers return across our Thompson district and prepare for the upcoming school year, today marked an occasion for the staff at Laurene Edmondson Elementary School to reflect upon the question, “What does it mean to be a STEM school?”

A National Effort

A national effort to dramatically improve education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) is underway. Five schools in the Thompson School District have selected to fine-tune their their school mission and vision towards an emphasis in science, technology, engineering, and/or math. These schools are: Berthoud High School, Turner Middle School, Ivy Stockwell Elementary, Laurene Edmondson Elementary and Big Thompson Elementary. Conrad Ball Middle School is embarking on a comprehensive Technology focus, and Mountain View High School hosts our district’s largest pre-engineering course selections.

Last spring, the faculty and school accountability committee at Laurene Edmondson unanimously voted in favor of  becoming a STEM focus school. 

The Power of STEM

STEM education focus schools use science and math as core content throughout the school day. They endeavor to deliver enriched learning experiences that captivate the curious minds of learners through carefully planned units of inquiry.  Students are empowered to ask questions, solve problems, and seek innovative solutions.

STEM schools strive to create a culture of collaboration, confidence, and critical thinking.  The power of technology is harnessed to activate and explore 21st Century applications through data analysis, design process, and programming.

Local & Regional Collaboration

The faculty at Laurene Edmondson worked closely with their colleagues at Ivy Stockwell Elementary, as both schools are kicking off a STEM focus this year.  Together, these schools have sought to extend their knowledge by partnering with two schools in the Adams 12 Five Star Schools that began their STEM focus a year in advance. Through this regional collaboration, Thompson educators have learned strategies what pitfalls to avoid in the implementation process, and what strategies to prioritize.

Throughout the year we will be sharing information about our STEM focus schools to illuminate the power of STEM education and how it helps us reach our mission of empowering students to learn, challenging them to achieve, and inspiring them to excel.

For more information about Laurene Edmondson’s STEM focus, contact their principal, Trish Malik at 613-6300.

 

Strengthening Our Approach for Science Inquiry

November 5th, 2011

by pmorgan

-

During our last Science Design Team gathering, we opened with a wondering question, “If we were to ask teachers in our district what instructional framework we use to teach science, what might they say?“ 

Inquiry, of course!

Our district has based its foundation for robust science instruction in inquiry  for a number of years.  However, we have not synthesized the research and developed a concrete, written framework that can be effectively used to describe  the components of science inquiry so that all teachers can access this mental model.

In our districtwide science focus year efforts, we have spent last year examining the new state standards and conducting a gap analysis between what we currently have as expectations for student learning and what we need to have as expectations for student learning. We have also been keeping up to date with the ongoing status of the Next Generation Science Standards that are being developed at the national level.  Our work has identified potential gap areas that will need to be mitigated with the selection of additional materials and/or repurposing of existing materials.

Before we can make sound curriculum materials selection decisions, we need a comprehensive framework for research-based approaches to science instruction. With limited access to resources, it is critical that we develop strong criteria for our selection decision-making process.

In order to frame our thinking about instructional frameworks, we read and analyzed Arthur H. Camins’ article on Dimensions of Inquiry. Then we reviewed the P-12 Comprehensive Balanced Math, K-2 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy, 3-5 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy, 6-12 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy and Art Instructional Frameworks already used in our district.

Finally, we scanned documents and information related to the Science Inquiry Model as depicted in the literature.

As we strengthen our Thompson Science Instructional Framework, we will use it as a guide to review our perceived needs for materials and resources.  Next time we meet on December 2 we will continue to develop our Thompson Instructional Framework for Science and extend our thinking by exploring and select to read as a group:
- -

Community Perspectives on Science

May 14th, 2011

Members of our Science Design Team had a chance to connect with a group from our community representing the field of science in higher education, non-profit organizations, government, and business.  The purpose of the connect time was to spark a conversation to better understand how our community members engage in science in their daily lives and how they believe education should support youth in the learning of scientific concepts and practice.

Here is who we met with and what we learned:

Zach Shelley Program Director of the Big Thompson Watershed Forum is in charge of monitoring the water quality on the Big Thompson River and ensuring the health of the watershed.  The science strands that are included in his work include chemistry, physics, environmental engineering, life science, environmental science and earth science.

To be successful in his field, it is important to have hands-on technology skills, a working knowledge of the equipment used to test and analyze the water quality, background knowledge in a wide range of science disciplines and critical thinking skills to effectiely analyze and understand the results of his findings.  Graphing skills, trend analysis, and statistics are all vital components of his work.  When the data has been gathered and analyzed, Zach must present his findings and recommendations to his stakeholders, the board of directors and government agencies.

The implications for science education is to ensure the integration of  literacy, mathematics, and collaborative skills in science instruction.  Science education should also focus on modeling, looking for patterns and trends, and applying that information to make connections or address problems that may affect the community.

Joe Chaplin, City of Loveland Stormwater and Engineering – We learned that Joe is very active throughout community engaging in partnerships and outreach.  For example, he is responsible for coordinating the Water Festival for 5th graders, Spring Clean-up for the Thompson River, other events to spread the message of “Good Housekeeping” and environmental stewardship.  In terms of what his hunches are about what students need to understand about science, he mentioned several things.  His big ideas were around creating change through P-12 education and social responsibility, so that families receive the message about environmental stewardship from their children in our schools. He spoke of how interconnected scientific fields are, explaining how healthy watersheds are connected to clean air, and wetlands are connected to environmental biology.  He also differentiated causal factors, such as polluted runoff finding its way into the storm systems contaminating our water supply, versus correlations that students need to understand, such as the function and locations of flood planes in order to make thoughtful decisions about where they buy their homes as adults. The implications for the P-12 system and beyond are that our curriculum should have an over-all theme of connectivity, critical thinking, problem-solving, and common sense.  Working to instill pride and ownership in students’ work, helping them see tasks as on-going and related to one another, instead of click-&-go, and teaching them to avoid slip-shod workmanship will better equip our students for success in the real world.

 

Dr. Nathan Balasubramanian, Director of Accountability and Accreditation, Thompson School District – Nathan has taught science, technology, and engineering across three continents. He has a distinguished history of researching, designing, and implementing highly acclaimed assessment and instructional models. He publishes peer-reviewed articles and presents papers to advance research goals and engineer educational excellence. In our discussion with Dr. B. we discussed the necessity of identifying what knowledge students come into class with as well as what would be the next step of what to bring them up to the expected outcome level of the course.  Dr. B recommended several research based approaches to help accomplish this goal including:

  • The Facet Based Approach to Science Education
  • LEAPS – Learning progressions in science
  • Science Idea Project

He talked about “Thinking Like a Scientist” and “Thinking Like an Engineer” He noted the importance of students being able to make a claim and support it with evidence. We discussed the importance of testing and measuring in two aspects: How will we test and measure what students know and how will students test and measure their ideas or hypotheses in science.  The implications for us as science educators are to ensure that we provide opportunities for students to apply and use the knowledge they gain, ensure that students need to know foundational concepts in order to do higher level thinking, and work to create a balance between “factoid learning” and critical thinking. Kids need to be able to think, articulate, and reason.

 

Ray Tshillard, Director and District 6 Consultant of Poudre Learning Center – His perspective on what science looks like in his world is relevance, inquiry based and nature of science.  Nature of science refers to problem solving and critical thinking.  As a child, his recollection of his mom telling him “get outside and don’t come back until dinner” sparked a passion for him wanting to read more in depth to discover answers to his scientific wonderings. The implications for the P-12 science education system, through his lens, is to make certain students are able to think conceptually.  As educators we need to help students develop process skills, which includes collecting data, analyzing, making observations and communicating the results. Technology should be infused throughout the process skills in science. Hands on experiments and activities are catalysts to the comprehension of key science concepts. Teachers should reach out to community members for support to help implement these ideas.  As educators, something to ponder, is how do we continue and encourage kids to ask questions.  We also need to be mindful of our local and regional surroundings as learning resources.

 

Chris Romero, Lead Faculty at Front Range Community College in Natural and Environmental Science - Dr. Romero teaches General Biology, in his world he asks his students to focus on Critical Analysis. He believes they need to know how to collect and analyze data in a meaningful manner. Science Literacy is another important focus. Since Dr. Romero’s area is biology, to him literacy is more than just comprehension; it is application to public policy implementation, environmental issues, public speaking and writing about science topics and issues. He uses collaborative learning, models, labs and lectures to help implement these two important concepts. The implications for our P-12 ducation system are varied. We must work to ensure students have analytical skills. He is concerned that our students demand instant gratification, they seem to expect to get the answer and move on to another concept or topic quickly. There is a high degree of frustration when the answer is not forthcoming and the students need to analyze the information. We must work to ensure that students are critical, comprehending readers. He finds that too often students do not understand that scientists need to go through a process to gain understanding. Instead they read the materials, compartmentalize the information and do not make the connections with their prior knowledge. The last implication is the need for students to understand the process and nature of science. Students often do not understand what science can and cannot do. Science is a process of thought. The question that needs to be asked is “What is science really about?” For example, what is a hypothesis versus a theory? He works to engage students in this process through cooperative/collaborative learning; hands on models; discussions; and case studies.

 

Trudy Trimbath, Environmental Specialist Thompson School District – Trudi has worked for Thompson for the last 5 years. Previous to this, she worked at HP for a number of years. She engages in science work every day. Some examples are the radon tests which must be conducted of the school prior to 18 months after schools are built. She must understand the contaminants that are in the air and the effects on students. She regularly conducts air quality tests to make sure students are learning in a safe environment. She needs to understand the effects of heavy metals and other chemicals and she uses data from nurses about student symptoms that might be arising and they analyze it do determine whether it’s related to food preparation, building risks (cleaning procedures), weather, etc. The implications to our students are vast.  She believes all students should have a strong foundation in biology, chemistry, and physiology. Chemistry is crucial to those in her field because one must analyze chemicals and their effects on the human body. Math skills are also needed. She uses math and science to help her analyze various aspects of water quality, its discharge rates and contaminants in particles per million. She feels it’s important for students to be able to appy what they learn to real life problems. Leadership and problem solving skills are a must in order for a smooth transition into the real world as these help students troubleshoot and work in an ever-changing environment. And, writing skills are crucial for effective communication between staff.

 

Thomas Ligon, Owner/Inventor ARC Science simulations – Tom is the creator if the OmniGlobe. He used his physics and engineering background to create the OmniGlobe. There was a lot of computer programing involved in the process. He has hired outside people for content knowledge such as geologists and artists and machinists as fabricators. Tom has had to be an entrepreneur and a problem solver and his best employees have also been great problem solvers and critical thinkers. From his perspective, science should be engaging and apply to the real world.  Students should have competence, confidence, and pride in what they do.  Science should encompass the learners’ natural curiosity and meet their hands on needs and create when possible.  The implications for us as P-12 science teachers are to ensure that science instruction be balanced and interdisciplinary with a global perspective. Tom believes that science is about problem solving and critical thinking; looking at a ways to do things better and more efficiently and solving everyday real word problems.


 

 

 

 

Science Curriculum Review Gets Spring Start

May 14th, 2011

On May 2, twenty teacher leaders gathered to kick off our science curriculum review process.  The participants included high school science department chairs, middle school science curriculum coordinators, elementary math/science liaisons, curriculum TOSAs and other interested classroom teachers.

The Process

Like the Social Studies Design Team members, who will turn their attention to elementary, preschool and 8th grade levels next year, the Science Design Team members will engage in a process outlined in Deep Curriculum Alignment by Fenwick English and Betty Steffy for developing a “front-loaded curriculum in order to identify our district priorities related to curriculum, instruction, assessment.

The Purpose

It is our purpose to determine our most critical needs in the areas described below, prioritize them at a district level, make recommendations to our Curriculum Improvement Council to financially support the priorities and the implementation plans.  The Design Team will review the needs in the following four areas:

  • Curriculum
    • creating clear learning expectations – what students need to know, understand, and be able to do
    • aligning learning expectations for a P-12 articulation
    • identifying and selecting appropriate resources to support the students as they learn
  • Instruction
    • conducting a literature review of best practices in science teaching for 21st Century learners
    • developing a strong instructional framework that highlights high-yield instructional strategies and best practices
  • Assessment
    • reviewing best practices for formative and summative assessments in science
    • creating and/or selecting valid and reliable performance assessments
    • identifying strategies to effectively communicate success and feedback to students and their families
  • Professional Learning
    • conducting a skills gap analysis for teachers and principals
    • identifying the support needed to effectively access curriculum, implement instruction, and apply/use assessments

The Timeline

It is expected that the Design Team will engage in the curriculum review and support process over the next 2-3 years. Funding allocations are expected to be available to support the first wave priorities identified by the group in January 2012. It is anticipated that additional funding allocations will be set aside in 2013 and 2014 as well.

The Best Hopes and Concerns

Members of the design team engaged in a rich conversation detailing their best hopes and concerns related to the outcomes of this process.  They are as following:

Hopes

  • Transparency and clarity provided throughout the process for all across district
  • Alignment and articulation in all grade levels, P-12
  • Strong and active community engagement
  • Confidence in knowing our needs and being savvy about our decisions
  • Results of our efforts will truly prepare all students for their needs/future paths in their college or career paths
  • Strong supports for our pedagogy and curriculum implementation
  • P-12 stakeholders supporting each other and sharing their expertise
  • That we all see this as OUR work – we have ownership in it
  • This is a long term process, not a one-shot experience

Concerns

  • Zero-based budgets create ambiguity and lack fidelity to process
  • Lack of information related to how much money will we have to spend
  • Poorly timed purchases that may not align with new Common Core science standards
  • Having the skills/support to use any new resources we select effectively
  • Missing out on opportunities from local businesses and grants
  • Overall cynicism and mistrust will derail the work
  • Our good work doesn’t take hold and creates more cynicism
  • This won’t be seen as “our” work – and that we are not all in this together

I’d like to thank the following Science Design Team members in advance, as this process will be time-consuming but potentially transforming for our Thompson community.

  • Jane Ballard – Berthoud High School
  • Darlene Halverson – Loveland High School
  • Jason Jackson – Thompson Valley High School
  • Bart Mayes – Mountain View High School
  • Janet Fuerniss – Turner Middle School
  • Scott Erickson – Walt Clark Middle School
  • Kathleen Kingdom – Bill Reed Middle School
  • Eduardo Navidad – Conrad Ball Middle School
  • Chastity Stringer – Lucile Erwin Middle School
  • Jennifer Fodness – Monroe – Kindergarden
  • Barb Randall – Van Buren – 1st Grade
  • Amy Pett – Ponderosa – 2nd Grade
  • Serene Shook – Monroe – 3rd Grade
  • Robert Jones – Berthoud – 4th Grade
  • Ann Royer – Mary Blair – 5th Grade
  • Jan Lanting – Elementary Science TOSA
  • Andy Kaufman – OmniGlobe TOSA
  • Betsy Porter – Literacy TOSA
  • Jeannie Sponheim – Lincoln – Interventionist & Instructional Coach

 

OmniGlobe Classes this Summer

March 13th, 2010

Andy Kaufman, our grant-funded OmniGlobe (TOSA) Guy, is busy finishing up a TIC application for a series of summer classes so that teachers can stay learn how to use the OmniGlobe to integrate social studies and science content. Participants can earn 1.5 credits plus an additional $100 stipend after they integrate an OmniGlobe lesson into their class.

If you haven’t had a chance to learn about the OmniGlobe, that is very sad! The OmniGlobe is our district’s newest piece of cool technology that was donated by the Erion Foundation and ARC Science Simulations. The Erion Foundation also is funding Andy’s position for the next two years. We are extremely thankful for this amazing opportunity to deepen student engagement and conceptual learning through this unique technology.  Contact Andy if you want more information…