Posts Tagged ‘P-12 Council’

Curriculum Improvement Council – Is it Improving?

April 4th, 2011

Since 2007 our district has put a “moratorium” on new courses.  The past process of curriculum improvement had been put into a sense of standstill as teachers with ideas for new courses were not considered.

As I transitioned into the role of director, the feedback from many administrators, teachers and secondary curriculum leaders was that this needed to change. There needed to be a mechanism for bringing forward new ideas for classes.

There seemed very little argument against this.  Knowing the rapid pace of change in our world, the force of globalization, and that great ideas come from the roots of our system – putting the pieces and parts of a process back together was a definite MUST DO. The CIC (Curriculum Improvement Council) was overhauled, the process was refined, the P-12 Councils were put into place, leaders for the P-12 Councils were identified, and new courses went through the process and began to be approved…or denied….or tabled….

thumbs up?

So after a year, I need to ask – How did we do? With regards to the updated process of bringing forward new class ideas through the P-12 Council leaders, the councils themselves, and to the teachers of that content and their school administrators?

  1. What is working?
  2. What isn’t working?
  3. How can we improve the Curriculum Improvement process?

Looking forward to your thoughts in the comments section:

Connecting Peers to Purpose and P-12 Councils

August 28th, 2010

binaural-beat-digital-drug by digitalbob8 CC

As a language arts teacher, schema theory made a lot of sense to me and formulated the bedrock of my instruction.  The theory describes how knowledge is organized in our minds via an elaborate network and how ideas take shape in the form of mental models that frames how we makes sense of our world.

When we learn, our brain works to make connections between what is new and what is already known.  Learners feel tension when information conflicts with their prior knowledge.  Learning is facilitated when teachers help create connections between the known and the unknown.

I felt a good degree of learning tension as I entered my new role as curriculum and instruction director the previous year because I could not understand the curriculum improvement process. While our district has used a Curriculum Improvement Council (CIC) for a number of years many members and non-members did not connect with the purpose behind the council.  According to our school board policy, the role of the Curriculum Improvement Council is clear; it is to support, oversee and recommend strategies for the continuous improvement our district’s curriculum and instruction.  Connecting with as many teacher leaders as possible last year, I grew to believe that the development of P-12 Curriculum Councils could greatly enhance the effectiveness, transparency and efficiency of curriculum improvement throughout the district.

Connecting Peers with Purpose

Michael Fullan’s second secret in his book, The Six Secrets of Change: What the Best Leaders Do to Help Their Organizations Survive and Thrive is about connecting peers with purpose.  The Thompson P-12 Curriculum Councils will serve as a conduit for communication, creation, and innovation of curriculum and instruction.  The idea stems from the desire to connect peers purposefully in this process.  The leaders of each of the P-12 Councils along with representatives from administration, counseling, gifted and talented, exceptional student services, and English language acquisition will meet monthly to assist with the setting of district priorities with regards to resource allocation, program focus, and content renewal. This group will also assist with goal setting and program evaluation so that our work fully encompasses the cycle of planning, doing, checking and adjusting.

Our district will be well represented by these P-12 Council Leaders:

  • Visual Arts – Lora Patrick
  • Performing Arts – Bob Kreutz & Susan Harding
  • Career & Technical Education – Michelle Logan, Tom Frayer, Janese Asche, Amber Wharton
  • Literacy – Will Sherman
  • Math – Tom Hanson
  • PE & Health – Dawn Fertitta
  • Science – Chastity Stringer
  • Social Studies – Carin Barrett
  • Technology integration – Val Downing
  • World Languages – Toni Theisen

Agenda items and Curriculum Improvement Council (CIC) mintues will be shared on the Thompson Curriculum & Instruction Wikispace under Curriculum Improvement Council Meetings.

P-12 Council Leaders will have an opportunity to meet face to face with their stakeholder groups during two annual half-day P-12 Council gatherings held in the fall and the spring.  The purpose of these meetings is to assess and synthesize content area needs related materials, resources, and the professional development support required to effectively accelerate learning.  They will connect regularly with their colleagues though district content early release Wednesday gatherings, secondary curriculum leader meetings and elementary curriculum leader meetings.  They will also communicate with stakeholder groups via email, blogs, and web pages related to their individual content area work.

I look forward to sharing our efforts as well and as always, welcome thoughts, comments and ideas.

P-12 Council February Update

February 23rd, 2010

Tuesday February 16 marked the day of our P-12 Science and Social Studies Council. High School department chairs, middle school curriculum coordinators, social studies task force members and other invited guests were present.

The day ran similar to our P-12 Literacy and Math Council meetings, intentionally to provide consistency and shared schema between the leadership groups. It was valuable to share our thinking and deepen our understanding of how we may be effected by the new states standards revision.

The pupose of these new councils is to do just that: provide a context for developing shared dialogue and discussion with the intent to make collegial decisions at a district level. Decisions made on this day were as follows:
Science

High School
1) Continue to align required course outcomes for Geophysical and Bio/Life at 9th and 10th grades with new state standards.
2) Wait for state to take lead on identifying assessment frameworks prior to identifying essential learnings.

Middle School
1) Maintain articulated content until further study: earth at 6th, life at 7th, and physical at 8th.
2) Complete alignment of current course outcomes with new state standards to ensure all “holes are plugged”

Elementary and Early Childhood
1) Continue to analyze new standards and wait for further notification from state regarding assessment frameworks
2) Plan potential timeline and resources needed to adhere to state’s new content articulation, for example plants and insects at 1st and 2nd grades.

Social Studies
High School
1) Integrate financial literacy standards in Economics.
2) Complete aligment for Civics, World Geo & History, and Modern America with new state standards.

Middle School
1) Complete alignment with new state standards.
2) identify appropriate level of support for 6th and 7th grades which will require the most change: resources, professional development , collaboration time.

Elementary and Early Childhood
1) Complete alignment with new state standards.
2) identify appropriate level of support for grades which will require the most change: resources, professional development , collaboration time.