Posts Tagged ‘global citizenship’

Because we didn’t buy textbooks…

January 8th, 2011

Book Worm BotThis time we did something different.

We entered our social studies curriculum adoption cycle and we made a departure from our past practice.  We decided to spend a year focusing on instructional pedagogy before we started looking at all the materials various publishers have to offer.

We immersed ourselves in learning about powerful pedagogy that stimulates student engagement, instruction that evokes critical thinking, and learning structures that support authentic problem solving and exploratory learning and deep understanding and excitement and passion and fun.

And when our state adopted new social studies standards we reviewed them with a critical eye and we still held off looking at materials and we thought about how we wanted to teach to impact student learning. And when we read the research and reviewed the literature, we decided to look at various materials from various publishers and we thought…we’d rather not buy textbooks this time.

If we didn’t buy textbooks, we could do something different.
Because we didn’t buy textbooks

we were able to purchase digital tools that could engage students in active, connected learning.

Because we didn’t buy textbooks…

we were able to think about the world as our world geography curriculum and the plethora of information that is ready at our fingertips and a click away.

Because we didn’t buy textbooks…

we were able to think about possibilities that didn’t exist for us because we didn’t have the resources to learn like global citizens

________________________

So now….we don’t have text books and we will be sharing what we have instead – and – all the things we are doing to support learning in our classrooms with out them.

Will the New State Standards Transform Education?

August 10th, 2010

Hope by MatteoSP CC

Yes!  But only if we Colorado educators make it so…

As we return to the classrooms this fall, we know that we have one year to familiarize ourselves with the new state standards before being required by law to implement them in December, 2011.

If you attended one of the regional meetings facilitated by the Colorado Department of Education, or visited their site about the new state standards, then you know that the state has a strong desire for districts to revolutionize instructional practice and that their worst fear is losing this opportunity to do so.

They want the new standards to be the catalyst that transforms education in Colorado.


They want our schools to focus on the dispositions, skills and knowledge students need to be successful in the 21st century.


They want our schools to shift their focus from basic skills which hang on the lowest rung of Bloom’s Taxonomy to those which rest on the highest rung of that ladder and involve analysis, application, and creation.


They want students actively engaged in relevant, authentic 21st Century tasks that support critical analysis, problem solving, creative and innovative thinking across a wide range of topics and through a global perspective.

They know that the only way we will close the global achievement gap described by Tony Wagner, is to reverse current practices that have reduced deep learning to skill and drill practice sessions designed to increase student achievement as measured by the current state assessments.

We in Thompson believe we can use this opportunity to reflect upon the new state standards, and those currently being aligned with the Common Core in reading and math, and transform the educational experience for each and every child in our community.

We will use this school year to delve into the new standards, understand the possibilities and potential for robust learning within them, work collaboratively to develop a shared vision for common student outcomes in all of our courses, share these with families and students, and leverage our resources and systems to support teachers and schools with the materials, knowledge, skills and innovative pathways to make this transformation a reality.

Using the Teaching & Learning Cycle, we will begin by focusing on the questions:

  1. What should all students learn and why?
  2. How will we know all students have learned?
  3. How will we teach to ensure all students learn?
  4. How will we respond when students don’t learn or learn prior to expectation?

This year we will focus on the first two questions. This will provide us a strong foundation to really understand what we want students to know and be able to do.

The new assessment design is still in play. The assessment committees are beginning to meet and hopefully have the opportunity and wherewithal to give themselves the chance to really do some out of the box thinking about assessments.

Few educators I know believe much will change unless the assessment system changes in a meaningful way.  They know that we can incorporate all the higher level learning targets we want but if these targets are not assessed by the state, the pressure to ensure the mastery of the skills which are assessed will continue to be the main focus of school based work.

However, I believe we should put aside our skepticism for a while. Let us capture this opportunity to build a vision of new possibilities. Let us reframe our capacity to challenge our students to achieve, empower them to learn, and inspire them to succeed in the present and the future while using these new standards as a catalyst for that transformation.

I  know that I am looking forward to discovering how we can use this opportunity to strengthen our vision of learning across our community, together.

Wishing I Learned How to Learn

July 1st, 2010

Shaun Koh explained to the audience that he was educated in Singapore, but he grew up on the Internet. He read the web version of the New York Times, watched streamed television from Korea, and used the same Google to find out the answers to his questions just like everyone else around the world.

His best teachers were like “shepherds” helping him, guiding him, listening to him, and nurturing his passions and his curious nature.

But when he was asked by the forum moderator during the ISTE 2010 Keynote on Innovation and Excellence what he wished he had learned in school, Shaun paused and sighed, “I wish I had learned how to learn.” He learned a lot of curriculum, he explained.  But no one taught him how to learn.

It’s been this university student, Shaun Koh, currently studying in Michigan, who shared his perspectives at the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) annual conference held in Denver that has stimulated the core of my being since.

As a teacher in the late late 90′s I was turned on to the idea of meta-cognition, thinking about your thinking.  And now, stimulated by this conference I am wondering if there is a term for learning about your learning.

  • What does it look like when you know how to learn?
  • What does it look like to help others learn how to learn?
  • How have I learned how to learn?
  • What do I do when I need to learn something?

I’ve been thinking about all the things that I have had to learn in the past year since moving into the directorship of curriculum and instruction. Since there were so many things to learn, it is easy for me to reflect upon myself as a learner.

As an adult learner, I know that I need several things in order to learn.

  1. I need the big picture. I need to see the concept that I need to learn and how it relates to something else I already understand.  I need to see how the ideas are interconnected and relate to one another, whether similar, different, or somewhere in the middle.
  2. I need to connect with other people who have already learned what I am trying to learn, currently learning the same thing or learning something similar to what I am trying to learn.  It’s great when someone has already traveled the road I am on and can help me with my learning. But, if I am learning something all together new, then I love to find learning partners – people who are also trying to learn what I am trying to learn.  I’ve learned that I need to connect with other people because of two other reasons.
  3. I need models and examples. My first choice is getting copies of other folks models and examples.  To me, lots of things are models or examples.  I look to books, articles, blogs, journals, Twitterfeeds, wikis, forms, templates, audio feeds, videos, anything informative that I can digest to me is a model or example. I love to see how other folks put their thinking together, how they organize it, how they articulate it. If I can’t get models and examples from those who have gone before me, I learn by trying to create models and examples myself.  I create drafts of these models and share them with other people and get feedback.  The feedback helps me stretch my thinking and develops my understanding.
  4. I need to talk out loud. Writing is a way of talking out loud for me and I learn a lot by writing out my thoughts, connections, ideas, and opinions. but I have to admit that I prefer face to face conversation.  I definitely process my thinking through speaking out loud. One really great conversation can cause me to shift my thinking in infinite ways. If I don’t have anyone to speak with, I find that I do a lot of rehearsal in my own head space. This process shapes and refines my thinking and pushes me to a deeper level of understanding.
  5. I need to persist and practice. I have learned that I can grasp basic things pretty quickly.  I can sometimes trick myself into thinking that I have really learned something.  But, usually I only have a surface understanding of certain concepts, and sometimes that is enough. This can be problematic, because I can fool myself into thinking I have learned something when I really haven’t.  I’ve learned I’m always better off after spending more time learning, than less.
  6. I need to test my learning. Finding an audience for me to share my learning is important.  This way I get feedback, I get evaluative data, I get an opportunity to view my learning through the eyes of another.  The hardest part about this sometimes is being vulnerable and open to constructive criticism and potential failure. I’ve learned that if I test my learning in small bites, I can scaffold my own vulnerability and risk.  Plus, I have more opportunities to revise my thinking.

I wonder how well our students understand what they need to learn.  I wonder if they know what they need to learn in one context transfers to another.  I wonder if Shaun Koh will help others learn to be learners.

I wonder if we as educators spent time learning about how we learn if we would help students learn to be learners.