Elementary Social Studies Materials Refresh

February 26th, 2012 by Diane Lauer No comments »

Our incredible Elementary Social Studies Design team is midway through their resource selection process to provide schools with grade level appropriate supplementals to support the new Colorado Academic Social Studies Standards.

Knowing that our new standards are steeped in robust 21st Century learning skills, we  prioritized the types of resources most critically needed.  We carefully selected rich text and digital materials that can guide student inquiry into history, economics, civics, and geography content.

A strong social studies curriculum is grounded in rich text, essays, speeches, opinion pieces, newspaper, magazine, and journal articles as well as resources that visually display information like maps, charts, tables, infographics and graphs.  The inclusion of multimedia like photos, videos, graphics and other images allow an educator tools to increase background knowledge, inquiry, and robust discussion – and opportunity for written response.

Students should have abundant opportunities to engage in the close reading of these texts and write in direct repines to high quality questions.

“The predominant mode for such close reading, discussion, and writing should be some form of argument, such as having students support claims with evidence as they analyze, explain, and research topics they’re studying. Only this will ensure that they’re college and career ready.”

Smoker, M. (2011) Curriculum Now. Kappan. (93) 3. p. 71

Beginning next fall, we will ensure that every elementary classroom teacher of social studies has access to a projector and the following digital content that warehouse primary documents, video clips, rich text, supplemental lesson plans:

In addition, schools will acquire leveled text sets aligned with grade level social studies content in the area of history, economics, civics, and geography.  These text sets are aligned with Fountas & Pinnell levels, which will allow them to be easily integrated into school leveled reading libraries.

The first shipment of the texts were delivered to schools in February.  The second shipment of texts will take place in May, prior to the end of this school year.

Other texts that will be included will be teacher resource texts, anchor texts for read alouds, and various supplementary materials to support content integration with an emphasis in literacy.

 

Strengthening Our Approach for Science Inquiry

November 5th, 2011 by Diane Lauer No comments »

by pmorgan

-

During our last Science Design Team gathering, we opened with a wondering question, “If we were to ask teachers in our district what instructional framework we use to teach science, what might they say?“ 

Inquiry, of course!

Our district has based its foundation for robust science instruction in inquiry  for a number of years.  However, we have not synthesized the research and developed a concrete, written framework that can be effectively used to describe  the components of science inquiry so that all teachers can access this mental model.

In our districtwide science focus year efforts, we have spent last year examining the new state standards and conducting a gap analysis between what we currently have as expectations for student learning and what we need to have as expectations for student learning. We have also been keeping up to date with the ongoing status of the Next Generation Science Standards that are being developed at the national level.  Our work has identified potential gap areas that will need to be mitigated with the selection of additional materials and/or repurposing of existing materials.

Before we can make sound curriculum materials selection decisions, we need a comprehensive framework for research-based approaches to science instruction. With limited access to resources, it is critical that we develop strong criteria for our selection decision-making process.

In order to frame our thinking about instructional frameworks, we read and analyzed Arthur H. Camins’ article on Dimensions of Inquiry. Then we reviewed the P-12 Comprehensive Balanced Math, K-2 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy, 3-5 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy, 6-12 Comprehensive Balanced Literacy and Art Instructional Frameworks already used in our district.

Finally, we scanned documents and information related to the Science Inquiry Model as depicted in the literature.

As we strengthen our Thompson Science Instructional Framework, we will use it as a guide to review our perceived needs for materials and resources.  Next time we meet on December 2 we will continue to develop our Thompson Instructional Framework for Science and extend our thinking by exploring and select to read as a group:
- -

Boys, held back for life?

October 9th, 2011 by Diane Lauer 4 comments »

Yesterday I was scanning my NYTimes feed in Newsrack and stopped when I read this title, “Delay Kindergarten at Your Own Peril.” As an educator, a title like that begs to be read.  I stopped mid-swipe, clicked and read the provocative opinion penned by researchers Sam Wang and Sandra Aamodt who provided detailed research explaining why “redshirting” your child could be dangerous.

Strikingly to me, this is the first time I had heard any argument against this practice. In fact, holding younger children back to enter kinder the following year, is such a common practice I don’t even blink when I hear it. My bad.  I should definitely have been more involved in reading the research.

Teachers may encourage redshirting because more mature children are easier to handle in the classroom and initially produce better test scores than their younger classmates. In a class of 25, the average difference is equivalent to going from 13th place to 11th. This advantage fades by the end of elementary school, though, and disadvantages start to accumulate. In high school, redshirted children are less motivated and perform less well. By adulthood, they are no better off in wages or educational attainment — in fact, their lifetime earnings are reduced by one year.

In our community, redshirting is much more common for boys than girls. Reading this opinion piece troubles me because I have been assuming that this practice is actually benefits our students. However, Wang and Aamodt provide evidence how an intellectually demanding environment actually increases skills and abilities as well as motivation.

These differences may come from the increased challenges of a demanding environment. Learning is maximized not by getting all the answers right, but by making errors and correcting them quickly. In this respect, children benefit from being close to the limits of their ability. Too low an error rate becomes boring, while too high an error rate is unrewarding. A delay in school entry may therefore still be justified if children are very far behind their peers, leaving a gap too broad for school to allow effective learning

It strikes me that we tend to redshirt our boys more than we do our girls, and I’m wondering if this connects to the higher rate of boys we have who become identified as learning disabled, at-risk, and trouble-makers who are suspended at a higher rate that girls.  I also think about the persistent gap that exists in many of our community schools between boys and girls in reading and writing. I wonder if we decreased the practice of redshirting if we would narrow these gaps.

I also think about our work in engaging families and how this research may help to inform parents while they are making these important choices for their children.

The Wisconsin Center for Education Research hosts the “Pros and Cons” of holding children back from kindergarten.  The describe the risks of delayed entry and the likely self-fulfilling prophecy that occurs when redshirting occurs.

Richard Gentry of Psychology Today posted a blog last year about this topic, Kindergarten – Ready or Not?  He advises that this important decision should not be one that is made quickly.  In fact, he recommends beginning to assess your beliefs and your child early on around age 3. He advocates finding the $320,000 kindergarten teacher, a nod to research describing the relationship between children who were enrolled in kindergarten classes with excellent teachers and their earning potential over their lifetime because of this early leg up.

I agree with Gentry that there is no right answer, and it really comes down to personal choice.  But on the side of the educators, I wonder what our role is? I’m thinking that we at least need to:

  • keep ourselves informed on the research in this area of study
  • increase the opportunities to educate and engage our families with the research and their best knowledge about their children
  • provide opportunities for our teaching staff to reflect up upon their own biases in this area and explore how their personal preferences may unconsciously influence parents

Constitution Day Resources

August 30th, 2011 by Diane Lauer 2 comments »

The United States government mandates that September 17 be observed as Constitution and Citizenship Day to commemorate the September 17, 1787, signing of the U.S. Constitution.

U.S. Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia added the Constitution Day clause to the 2005 federal spending bill. More people need to learn about the Constitution and its contents.

Because September 17 falls on a Saturday this year, most schools are celebrating on September 16.

We have received several calls from local community members interested in how our teachers support Constitution Day – therefore, this blog is a tool to communicate with our community and share how students in our schools will be participating.

Remember, Constitution Day is for all grades!

There are many great resources available including those collected by the Colorado State Library and the Colorado Association of Libraries.

We hope these prove valuable to librarians, teachers, faculty and the general public, any group creating an exciting commemoration. Some of the materials are bookmarks, lesson plans, links to the Bill of Rights and Constitution, games for youngsters, bibliographies, and lots more. Visit the pages below for free materials for you to download and copy as well as links to additional items.

The Library of Congress has created a collection of Teaching with Primary Sources that targets Constitution Day as well as an additional resource bank for Constitution Day.

And, as you may also know, all educational institutions that receive federal funding from the US Department of Education are required to honor this key historical event with educational program pertaining to the Constitution.

The official, federal Constitution Day! website is packed with resources as well. This resource bank was compiled by the National Constitution Center.  The National Archives has also compiled a resource bank of excellent materials.

I really like what the State of California has compiled for their Constitution Day resource bank. They have a good collection of resources developmentally appropriate materials by grade K-12. They link to a copy of the Constitution written in Spanish that is helpful.

Especially for Elementary Students

Would love to learn from you – What resources do you use in your classroom to support Constitution Day?

Social Studies Standards Update

August 23rd, 2011 by Diane Lauer No comments »

As a former social studies teacher, nothing has made me more excited to be able to spend the last two years focusing on the social studies content area as a new curriculum leader.  The challenge of unpacking the new state standards was one that was met by all of our teachers P-12 across the district.

The purpose of this post is to share some of the incredible resources that were created by our Thompson educators last spring and throughout the summer – as well as give a heads up regarding future work.

Standards Placemats

Last spring, our Thompson Standards Placemats were created and distributed on our Curriculum & Instruction Wikispace.  These are still available, and are a great tool for teachers wanting to see more standards on one page.  The feedback we received earlier about the state documents is that they were bulky and difficult to use.  The standards placemats can be printed on 8-1/2 x 11 and 11 x 17 which is nice if you want a classroom poster size document.

P-7 Scope and Sequence 

Also during the spring, several 6th grade and 7th grade teacher volunteers came forward to work on our scope and sequence documents.  I really appreciated their work, because how they structured the scope and sequence became the model for other content areas P-8.  Way to go!  The P-7 scope and sequence documents use the Understanding by Design (UbD) framework, and nicely outline not only the topical units, but the big ideas, essential questions, and the skills.  These documents will help our teachers move seamlessly into creating UbD Units of Study.

High School Curriculum Maps

Our high school social studies teachers have produced some excellent course map documents that are now available online via our Thompson Curriculum & Instruction Wikispace. The course and unit maps that are presently available are:

  • Civics
  • Economics
    • International Economics
    • Macro Economics
    • Micro Economics
    • Personal Financial Literacy
  • Modern America (1st Semester)
  • Modern America (2nd Semester)
  • World Geography I
  • World Geography II
  • World History

8th Grade Adoption Materials &
Scope/Sequence Development

At some point during the year, I will be sending emails to our 8th Grade US History teachers to request volunteers for our 8th grade scope and sequence development.  8th grade will also be receiving funds this year, at $20 per student for their social studies adoption, more information will be available at their upcoming District Wednesday on September 28, location to be determined.

Elementary Adoption Update

Members of the elementary social studies task force will be returning to work to review best thinking regarding materials purchase.  Last year, we were thinking about purchasing leveled readers that could be incorporated into literacy blocks.  We have approximately $140,000 set aside for the purchase of elementary materials districtwide. We will be soliciting feedback from all of our elementary teachers on their thoughts during the upcoming fall semester.

High School Language Arts, Speech and Drama Updates

August 18th, 2011 by Diane Lauer No comments »

Exciting opportunities are awaiting Thompson educators passionate about reading, writing, communicating and the theater arts!

Three specific topics are important for all of our 9-12 Language Arts department staff to know.  This blog post will share information about the following:

  • Accessing new standards resource documents
  • Collaboration days for 9, 10, 11, 12 grade LA teachers for curriculum alignment
  • Specific 12th Grade English focus work

New Standards Documents

Last year as a group you unpacked the new state standards, identified priority learnings and identified the similarities and differences in the new expectations for our students.

All the Standards Placemats for 9-12 grade English can be found on the our curriculum wikispace, including HS Speech.

Drama placemats were also created, and our drama teachers will use their District Wednesdays to continue the work they have begun last year aligning their courses to these new standards.

The Thompson Standards Placemats are an excellent starting point for our conversation around what students need to know, understand and be able to do. There are also plentiful links to the Common Core resources.  You will find them at the bottom of the Reading, Writing, and Communicatingwikipage. My particular favorite is Appendix C, a very large file – but a super good one filled with student writing exemplars.

Scope and Sequencing 9-12th Grade English

Last school year our Speech teachers met during the school day, using sub release time from our general professional development budget, and identified which oral communication standards would be addressed in HS Speech.  I am very appreciative of these efforts and am looking forward to learning what additional supports our Speech teachers need to confidently support student learning of these standards.

Because of their work, we now know which remaining standards and evidence outcomes need to be addressed in our comprehensive 9-12 English classes.

The process I am planning to use for our 9-12 English work is similar to the process we are using in grades P-8. This summer, we used grant funds to bring all 6, 7, and 8 grade LA teachers to create a scope and sequence and build their schema for using Understanding by Design principles.  We have set aside Title IIA grant funds to do the same with high school  9, 10, 11, and 12 grade teachers this year.

As you know, grade 12 is a bit sticky, and we are still waiting to hear from the state about new potential graduation requirements.  In the meantime, we will progress with our plan to give school sites an opportunity to offer a traditional grade 12 English semester, or grade 12 aligned electives in the following school year (2012-2013).

So….

Last year, we shared our High School START process map to demonstrate how we would transform and align robust learning expectations in Thompson.

We are at a point to collaboratively create a scope and sequence for these courses.  Working with Will Sherman, our P-12 Literacy Council Leader, we decided to begin with 9th grade first.  This way they could articulate upwards from 8th grade.  This also gives us some time to ensure that when we work on 12th grade, we have a clear vision of our articulation beforehand.

If you currently teach any of the following courses for 9-12th graders, you are welcome to attend our collaboration and mapping workshop.  The workshop will be a full day, you will need to use SubFinder code 306 (web) 40 (phone) to access this professional day.  Each teacher is invited to attend the grades he or she teaches even if multiple grades are taught. Below are the dates of the gatherings:

9th Grade – Thursday September 22 – 8-3:30 PM – Classroom 4

10th Grade – Thursday September 29 – 8-3:30 PM – Classroom 4

11th Grade – Thursday January 19 – 8-3:30 PM – Classroom 4

12th Grade – Thursday January 26 – 8-3:30 PM – Classroom 4

12th Grade Langauge Arts

It will be very important to have our 12th grade Language Arts scope and sequence completed so we can strategically align our new 12th Grade comprehensive course, and any elective courses that schools want to align.  This process will be one that is unfolding, and no doubt discussed at upcoming District Wednesdays.

————————————————–

With our English curriculum learning work being done outside of District Wednesdays, this leaves opportunity for other professional development topics to be explored.

High School English Department chairs will be meeting on Thursday, September 8, 3:30-5:00 PM to design the first District Wednesday which will be on September 28.

Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments in this blog, or email me privately through First Class.

Have a great week back with your students!

Middle School Math and LA Teachers Map New Standards

July 23rd, 2011 by Diane Lauer No comments »

It was the second week after school let out and it was already hot. Thank goodness we were working at Lucille Erwin and they were kind enough to crank up the AC because 87 of our middle school language arts, math, gifted and talented, English language acquisition, special education and media librarian teachers worked three days straight to:

  • Analyze all the new Common Core math and language arts standards
  • Create a universal scope and sequence 6-8
  • Engage in the process of creating standards-based units of practice using the principles of Understanding by Design

The Process

It was hard, messy work  and it involved a lot of heavy, cognitive thought.  Each morning we began with a mini-lesson to ground our thinking. The first day it focused on the standards themselves, then we addressed the process of creating a scope and sequence, then finally we delved into Understanding by Design principles.
-
We separated into content-specific grade level teams. Each team was supported with GT, Resource, ELA and Media teachers.  Each team had a TOSA facilitator from the Curriculum & Instruction department.  The facilitators were familiar with the process, and because they were on hand, all the teachers could engage as participants throughout the process.
-
Each group used Google Docs so we could continue our collaborative efforts throughout the course of the year. We knew that this was our first go at this work.  We learned that Google Docs can be temperamental, especially when trying to copy and paste.  But, we also learned how great it was to have a document ready to go at the end of each day’s work – that could be shared with other grade levels and teams.  We didn’t have to clog up our email accounts sharing documents.

The Products

During the institute, all the work products were linked to the Curriculum & Instruction Wikispace.  They became immediately available to all the teachers who were going to continue the curriculum work independently over the summer and into the fall.  These documents can be found at the wikispace and form these links individually:

We are very grateful to have been awarded a Recruitment and Retention Teacher Grant from the Colorado Department of Education. These funds were used exclusively to support this work and a few snacks.

The Next Steps

When math and language arts teachers return in the fall, they should be ready to begin working with their units of study.  They will use their district Wednesday professional development time to calibrate their thinking relative to the scope and sequence, units of practice, and student evidence of success.  My hope is that we use that time to analyze student work samples taken from Stage 2 in their unit plans.  Another area for future collaboration is in the construct of scoring rubrics related to the criteria of success.  Some groups were able to start working in this area, some will get to it during this fall.  Having a strong shared schema across our district  for what mastery looks like will be a definite leverage in our standards transformation work.

All the handouts, slides, and resources from the the Mapping Institute can be found on our Curriculum & Instruction Wikispace.

————————————

Since this original posting, new material has been released from CPM.  I highly recommend that our math teachers become familiar with these documents in order to support their teaching of the new state math standards.  We will be discussing our approach to using our scope and sequence and the supplementary materials as a district, but I expect that schools will be having these conversations as well.  It is important that we are well informed, prepared, and confident in our transition to the new common core.

CPM Website  - How to Supplement Current CPM Texts

 

Elementary Standards Alignment Team Gets the Job Done!

May 26th, 2011 by Diane Lauer 1 comment »

2 days, 3 layers of clothing, 4 pounds of chocolate, 55 educators deeply engaged in curriculum analysis and the Thompson School District are now the proud owners of powerful Scope and Sequence documents in the areas of

The Work

After setting the stage for the work ahead, these educators got right to work in grade level teams of approximately 8-10 elementary educators.  Thompson Curriculum & Instruction TOSAs helped facilitate the conversations, ideas, and determinations while typing the leveled scope and sequence into Google Docs which allowed easy access to other grade level groups, evening review by the participants, and ongoing edits and revisions throughout the process – and beyond.

The teachers grounded themselves in the literature of the Rigorous Curriculum Design process and the elements of the Understanding by Design frameworks which became the foundation for the structure of their collaborative work.  Within each scope and sequence, teachers created Overarching Course Big Ideas, Topics, Essential Questions, Big Ideas, and Aligned Evidence Outcomes, which included the Priority and Supporting Learnings.  Themes were not used or created by our teachers, as the thought was that schools would be better able to incorporate their own themes at the site level, especially supporting our schools with a focus like Science and Nature, Health and Wellness, Integrated Arts, etc.

They were given the parameters of chunking the Grade Level Expectations and Evidence Outcomes in each content area into 6 chunks that span across the year.  The number six was chosen because we have evidence of success in our district using this number of units to chunk across the year and we anticipate that six chunks may correlate well with the potential of our elementary schools moving away from a quarter system to a trimester system with our ensuing standards-based gradebook work.

Providing standardization of six chunks in all content areas in all grades P-5 also allows our district to engage in vertical alignment – within each grade, so that content can be integrated into trans-disciplinary units, and across grades, so that learning can be articulated and supported within a school system.  Note the following articulation sequences by topic:

Next Steps

Several school teams will be using these scope and sequence documents during summer TIC credit classes to develop common assessments and/or plan units of study.  Other teachers may individually decide to use these scope and sequence documents to use to organize their planning of instruction for the upcoming year. Besides this blog post, we intend to share our work with teachers when we return to school either during TENS week or Building/District Wednesdays and use our professional development time through the course of the 2011-2012 school year to build our background knowledge in the areas of assessment literacy and unit design.

Big Ideas We Learned Through the Process

In the words of our teachers, here are the Big Ideas we are taking away from participating in this process:

  • a number of changes exist in the Social studies content
  • we are making progress on the START process
  • there needs to be alignment with materials, especially investigations
  • this was hard work
  • collaboration makes it better
  • natural integration opportunities exist because of this process
  • standards/evidence outcomes are used multiple times within topics across the sequence
  • our understanding of the standards has grown tremendously
  • our ability to take this work back to our buildings
  • vertical alignment of topics/Units of Study
  • coming up with overarching big ideas was tough
  • we need time to collaborate
  • we would like to have time with the grade above – especially if teaching in a combo
  • need vertical conversations before we write units
  • we have a lot to teach all year long – we are wondering how we support brand new teachers
  • we really hit the most salient points with our essential questions and big ideas
  • we can trust what we did – lots of agreement
  • would like to ensure smooth transition with verbage, etc vertically
  • would like to see Steamboat examples, other models
  • this isn’t set in stone…lots of revision and revisiting will be needed – plan, do , check, adjust
  • so much more to know and do…
  • change in mind set and practices
  • this product will help us be more organized and intentional
  • this product will help us be more meaningful
  • this work was exciting
  • there will be a direct connection between all grades and concept/skills

I would like to thank all the educators who participated in this process.  The process was deeply engaging, powerfully introspective, and systemically rewarding.  Their work on part of our district sets the stage for attaining our Vision 20/20 goals.

Community Perspectives on Science

May 14th, 2011 by Diane Lauer No comments »

Members of our Science Design Team had a chance to connect with a group from our community representing the field of science in higher education, non-profit organizations, government, and business.  The purpose of the connect time was to spark a conversation to better understand how our community members engage in science in their daily lives and how they believe education should support youth in the learning of scientific concepts and practice.

Here is who we met with and what we learned:

Zach Shelley Program Director of the Big Thompson Watershed Forum is in charge of monitoring the water quality on the Big Thompson River and ensuring the health of the watershed.  The science strands that are included in his work include chemistry, physics, environmental engineering, life science, environmental science and earth science.

To be successful in his field, it is important to have hands-on technology skills, a working knowledge of the equipment used to test and analyze the water quality, background knowledge in a wide range of science disciplines and critical thinking skills to effectiely analyze and understand the results of his findings.  Graphing skills, trend analysis, and statistics are all vital components of his work.  When the data has been gathered and analyzed, Zach must present his findings and recommendations to his stakeholders, the board of directors and government agencies.

The implications for science education is to ensure the integration of  literacy, mathematics, and collaborative skills in science instruction.  Science education should also focus on modeling, looking for patterns and trends, and applying that information to make connections or address problems that may affect the community.

Joe Chaplin, City of Loveland Stormwater and Engineering – We learned that Joe is very active throughout community engaging in partnerships and outreach.  For example, he is responsible for coordinating the Water Festival for 5th graders, Spring Clean-up for the Thompson River, other events to spread the message of “Good Housekeeping” and environmental stewardship.  In terms of what his hunches are about what students need to understand about science, he mentioned several things.  His big ideas were around creating change through P-12 education and social responsibility, so that families receive the message about environmental stewardship from their children in our schools. He spoke of how interconnected scientific fields are, explaining how healthy watersheds are connected to clean air, and wetlands are connected to environmental biology.  He also differentiated causal factors, such as polluted runoff finding its way into the storm systems contaminating our water supply, versus correlations that students need to understand, such as the function and locations of flood planes in order to make thoughtful decisions about where they buy their homes as adults. The implications for the P-12 system and beyond are that our curriculum should have an over-all theme of connectivity, critical thinking, problem-solving, and common sense.  Working to instill pride and ownership in students’ work, helping them see tasks as on-going and related to one another, instead of click-&-go, and teaching them to avoid slip-shod workmanship will better equip our students for success in the real world.

 

Dr. Nathan Balasubramanian, Director of Accountability and Accreditation, Thompson School District – Nathan has taught science, technology, and engineering across three continents. He has a distinguished history of researching, designing, and implementing highly acclaimed assessment and instructional models. He publishes peer-reviewed articles and presents papers to advance research goals and engineer educational excellence. In our discussion with Dr. B. we discussed the necessity of identifying what knowledge students come into class with as well as what would be the next step of what to bring them up to the expected outcome level of the course.  Dr. B recommended several research based approaches to help accomplish this goal including:

  • The Facet Based Approach to Science Education
  • LEAPS – Learning progressions in science
  • Science Idea Project

He talked about “Thinking Like a Scientist” and “Thinking Like an Engineer” He noted the importance of students being able to make a claim and support it with evidence. We discussed the importance of testing and measuring in two aspects: How will we test and measure what students know and how will students test and measure their ideas or hypotheses in science.  The implications for us as science educators are to ensure that we provide opportunities for students to apply and use the knowledge they gain, ensure that students need to know foundational concepts in order to do higher level thinking, and work to create a balance between “factoid learning” and critical thinking. Kids need to be able to think, articulate, and reason.

 

Ray Tshillard, Director and District 6 Consultant of Poudre Learning Center – His perspective on what science looks like in his world is relevance, inquiry based and nature of science.  Nature of science refers to problem solving and critical thinking.  As a child, his recollection of his mom telling him “get outside and don’t come back until dinner” sparked a passion for him wanting to read more in depth to discover answers to his scientific wonderings. The implications for the P-12 science education system, through his lens, is to make certain students are able to think conceptually.  As educators we need to help students develop process skills, which includes collecting data, analyzing, making observations and communicating the results. Technology should be infused throughout the process skills in science. Hands on experiments and activities are catalysts to the comprehension of key science concepts. Teachers should reach out to community members for support to help implement these ideas.  As educators, something to ponder, is how do we continue and encourage kids to ask questions.  We also need to be mindful of our local and regional surroundings as learning resources.

 

Chris Romero, Lead Faculty at Front Range Community College in Natural and Environmental Science - Dr. Romero teaches General Biology, in his world he asks his students to focus on Critical Analysis. He believes they need to know how to collect and analyze data in a meaningful manner. Science Literacy is another important focus. Since Dr. Romero’s area is biology, to him literacy is more than just comprehension; it is application to public policy implementation, environmental issues, public speaking and writing about science topics and issues. He uses collaborative learning, models, labs and lectures to help implement these two important concepts. The implications for our P-12 ducation system are varied. We must work to ensure students have analytical skills. He is concerned that our students demand instant gratification, they seem to expect to get the answer and move on to another concept or topic quickly. There is a high degree of frustration when the answer is not forthcoming and the students need to analyze the information. We must work to ensure that students are critical, comprehending readers. He finds that too often students do not understand that scientists need to go through a process to gain understanding. Instead they read the materials, compartmentalize the information and do not make the connections with their prior knowledge. The last implication is the need for students to understand the process and nature of science. Students often do not understand what science can and cannot do. Science is a process of thought. The question that needs to be asked is “What is science really about?” For example, what is a hypothesis versus a theory? He works to engage students in this process through cooperative/collaborative learning; hands on models; discussions; and case studies.

 

Trudy Trimbath, Environmental Specialist Thompson School District – Trudi has worked for Thompson for the last 5 years. Previous to this, she worked at HP for a number of years. She engages in science work every day. Some examples are the radon tests which must be conducted of the school prior to 18 months after schools are built. She must understand the contaminants that are in the air and the effects on students. She regularly conducts air quality tests to make sure students are learning in a safe environment. She needs to understand the effects of heavy metals and other chemicals and she uses data from nurses about student symptoms that might be arising and they analyze it do determine whether it’s related to food preparation, building risks (cleaning procedures), weather, etc. The implications to our students are vast.  She believes all students should have a strong foundation in biology, chemistry, and physiology. Chemistry is crucial to those in her field because one must analyze chemicals and their effects on the human body. Math skills are also needed. She uses math and science to help her analyze various aspects of water quality, its discharge rates and contaminants in particles per million. She feels it’s important for students to be able to appy what they learn to real life problems. Leadership and problem solving skills are a must in order for a smooth transition into the real world as these help students troubleshoot and work in an ever-changing environment. And, writing skills are crucial for effective communication between staff.

 

Thomas Ligon, Owner/Inventor ARC Science simulations – Tom is the creator if the OmniGlobe. He used his physics and engineering background to create the OmniGlobe. There was a lot of computer programing involved in the process. He has hired outside people for content knowledge such as geologists and artists and machinists as fabricators. Tom has had to be an entrepreneur and a problem solver and his best employees have also been great problem solvers and critical thinkers. From his perspective, science should be engaging and apply to the real world.  Students should have competence, confidence, and pride in what they do.  Science should encompass the learners’ natural curiosity and meet their hands on needs and create when possible.  The implications for us as P-12 science teachers are to ensure that science instruction be balanced and interdisciplinary with a global perspective. Tom believes that science is about problem solving and critical thinking; looking at a ways to do things better and more efficiently and solving everyday real word problems.


 

 

 

 

Science Curriculum Review Gets Spring Start

May 14th, 2011 by Diane Lauer 2 comments »

On May 2, twenty teacher leaders gathered to kick off our science curriculum review process.  The participants included high school science department chairs, middle school science curriculum coordinators, elementary math/science liaisons, curriculum TOSAs and other interested classroom teachers.

The Process

Like the Social Studies Design Team members, who will turn their attention to elementary, preschool and 8th grade levels next year, the Science Design Team members will engage in a process outlined in Deep Curriculum Alignment by Fenwick English and Betty Steffy for developing a “front-loaded curriculum in order to identify our district priorities related to curriculum, instruction, assessment.

The Purpose

It is our purpose to determine our most critical needs in the areas described below, prioritize them at a district level, make recommendations to our Curriculum Improvement Council to financially support the priorities and the implementation plans.  The Design Team will review the needs in the following four areas:

  • Curriculum
    • creating clear learning expectations – what students need to know, understand, and be able to do
    • aligning learning expectations for a P-12 articulation
    • identifying and selecting appropriate resources to support the students as they learn
  • Instruction
    • conducting a literature review of best practices in science teaching for 21st Century learners
    • developing a strong instructional framework that highlights high-yield instructional strategies and best practices
  • Assessment
    • reviewing best practices for formative and summative assessments in science
    • creating and/or selecting valid and reliable performance assessments
    • identifying strategies to effectively communicate success and feedback to students and their families
  • Professional Learning
    • conducting a skills gap analysis for teachers and principals
    • identifying the support needed to effectively access curriculum, implement instruction, and apply/use assessments

The Timeline

It is expected that the Design Team will engage in the curriculum review and support process over the next 2-3 years. Funding allocations are expected to be available to support the first wave priorities identified by the group in January 2012. It is anticipated that additional funding allocations will be set aside in 2013 and 2014 as well.

The Best Hopes and Concerns

Members of the design team engaged in a rich conversation detailing their best hopes and concerns related to the outcomes of this process.  They are as following:

Hopes

  • Transparency and clarity provided throughout the process for all across district
  • Alignment and articulation in all grade levels, P-12
  • Strong and active community engagement
  • Confidence in knowing our needs and being savvy about our decisions
  • Results of our efforts will truly prepare all students for their needs/future paths in their college or career paths
  • Strong supports for our pedagogy and curriculum implementation
  • P-12 stakeholders supporting each other and sharing their expertise
  • That we all see this as OUR work – we have ownership in it
  • This is a long term process, not a one-shot experience

Concerns

  • Zero-based budgets create ambiguity and lack fidelity to process
  • Lack of information related to how much money will we have to spend
  • Poorly timed purchases that may not align with new Common Core science standards
  • Having the skills/support to use any new resources we select effectively
  • Missing out on opportunities from local businesses and grants
  • Overall cynicism and mistrust will derail the work
  • Our good work doesn’t take hold and creates more cynicism
  • This won’t be seen as “our” work – and that we are not all in this together

I’d like to thank the following Science Design Team members in advance, as this process will be time-consuming but potentially transforming for our Thompson community.

  • Jane Ballard – Berthoud High School
  • Darlene Halverson – Loveland High School
  • Jason Jackson – Thompson Valley High School
  • Bart Mayes – Mountain View High School
  • Janet Fuerniss – Turner Middle School
  • Scott Erickson – Walt Clark Middle School
  • Kathleen Kingdom – Bill Reed Middle School
  • Eduardo Navidad – Conrad Ball Middle School
  • Chastity Stringer – Lucile Erwin Middle School
  • Jennifer Fodness – Monroe – Kindergarden
  • Barb Randall – Van Buren – 1st Grade
  • Amy Pett – Ponderosa – 2nd Grade
  • Serene Shook – Monroe – 3rd Grade
  • Robert Jones – Berthoud – 4th Grade
  • Ann Royer – Mary Blair – 5th Grade
  • Jan Lanting – Elementary Science TOSA
  • Andy Kaufman – OmniGlobe TOSA
  • Betsy Porter – Literacy TOSA
  • Jeannie Sponheim – Lincoln – Interventionist & Instructional Coach